-
Re: This Week in Type: (((BROTHERS)))
At root, gender's just a fancy word for category, so I just assume that categorising typefaces by gender makes about as much or little sense as other classification schemes; i.e. do it if it is usefu…0 -
Re: The Mysteries of the Unicode Table
BTW, note that the 'combining grapheme joiner' is a bit of an oddity, not least because it doesn't join graphemes. There was a period when it looked like it might be deprecated, but then it was found…0 -
Re: Reactions: How insightful is Insightful?
I think you should keep the 'Insightful' flag. I think it's actually the only one that is particularly useful, indicating not simply that someone likes or agrees with a post, but that they found it u…3 -
Re: Should we enable polls on TypeDrawers?
That's why not.9 -
Re: FYI, OS X Mavericks OpenType bug for LNUM lookups
Kent, what I mean is that despite whatever a font maker has assigned to the Unicode codepoints, the proper place for decision regarding numeral style is at the application level, made by the typograp…0
